Saturday, 22 August 2009

Brazilliant

One of the most cliched aspects of my life lies in the fact that it was George Orwell's dystopian masterpiece '1984' which really got me into reading. I've met many people who were similarly inspired by Orwell and (without ever being ashamed of my love for his work) have always been slightly weary of its predictability as a 'modern classic', feeling that presenting myself to the world as a fan of Orwell casted me as somehow humorless and needlessly earnest.

It was my love of '1984' which recently led me to buy the film 'Brazil', a dystopian nightmare whose working title was '1984 1/2' (Nineteen Eighty Four and a Half).

But, the brilliance of 'Brazil' (Brazilliance, if you will) lies in its comic sensibility, its absurdly brilliant satire. Just as we should expect from director and ex-Python Terry Gilliam (co-written with Tom Stoppard, no less) it is dark, weird and hilarious in equal measure. Although occasionally the satire is ladled on a little too thickly, this is quickly forgotten as you sink into the lavish retro-futuristic sets and the wonderfully astute performances from a stellar cast (Jonathan Pryce, Robert De Niro, Michael Palin, Bob Hoskins to name just a few).

The real strength of Gilliam's 'Brazil' is that, unlike Orwell's vision of a slick, all-powerful totalitarian state, the powers-that-be in Brazil are often incompetent, work-shy, buck-passers. In 'Brazil', there is no Big Brotheresque villian. Rather, the enemy is bureaucracy itself, the nightmare is the nature of administration. Seen in this light, it is '1984' that reads like a wildly imaginative fantasy and 'Brazil' as a disturbingly realistic documentary.

I wholly recommend this film and am surprised it hasn't been packaged alongside the other Python masterpiece 'The Life of Brian'. In fact, watching 'Brazil', you're reminded that the best jokes in LoB are those that satirise administration and bureaucracy:

"Judean People's Front? Fuck off! We're the People's Front of Judea!"

Tuesday, 18 August 2009

Long, Long, Long


Josie Long is ace! I first encountered her refreshingly positive, awe-struck style of comedy on the Robin Ince Paramount podcasts, but didn't truly 'get' her until her excellent appearances on 'You Have Been watching' inspired a YouTube search.

In my more idiotic moments, (cowardly sheltering beneath my battered old irony umbrella) I've joked that there are no funny women on TV. Of course, I knew this wasn't really true and have laughed heartily at the routines of Jo Brand and Joan Rivers to name but two stand-ups, loved the writing of Jessica Stephenson on 'Spaced', the sly sensuality of Isy Suttie in Peep Show and the perfect timing of Sally Phillips in 'I'm Alan Partridge'. (Hmm, the very act of listing seems patronising and restrictive - make no mistake, I'm aware of the flaws of this entire post.)

Perhaps what I was really trying to say, though, is that I'd never seen a female comic who spoke to me in quite the same way as some of their male counterparts - I always felt slightly removed, slightly at-odds with the material. Well, I need squirm no longer: Josie Long's is a fresh, sharp, poetic voice and (if she wants to, which she may not) I'm convinced she's capable of storming British mainstream comedy in the next year or two.

Enough eulogising from me: hot-foot it to YouTube now, or (even better) read the fanzines at http://www.ilovejosielong.com

Sunday, 26 July 2009

Positive Discrimination

There’s a very obvious difference between the landscape of the town I was so expertly brought-up in, Market Harborough, and that of my current dwelling in North (our flat) and West (my job) London. This difference lies in the ethnic and racial diversity of the residents of these respective locations. To put it bluntly, in London I have lots of Black, Asian and East European neighbours/colleagues/friends and in Harborough had relatively few. Fortunately as I studied in Loughborough and worked in both Leicester and Nottingham, I was able to mix with people from a variety of backgrounds. However, aside from a few notable exceptions, Harbrough itself never really provided such opportunities.

As I say, a very obvious observation. Yet it was only the other day when I was due to meet my brother in Market Harborough that I strolled along the High Street and seriously felt that something was ‘amiss’. Absolutely everywhere I looked, there were white faces and after a year of living in London it genuinely felt strange, and, dare I say it... wrong?

Particularly as there’s such a diverse cohort of students at the college I teach at, I’m used to the (great) feeling of seeing an even distribution of white, black and brown faces every day. Of course, there was nothing wrong on Harborough High Street at all. But to my sensibility, it felt as though I was looking at a place I know (and love) with fresh eyes.

I was reminded of this frisson of discomfort today as Charlotte and I wandered around the cobbled streets of the beautifully picturesque city of Canterbury. We had a lovely day perusing the independent bookshops and taking in the majestic architecture of the famous cathedral. The thought of moving to a place such as Canterbury some day fluttered in my mind, until I scanned the people around me and, again, felt a pang of disappointment upon finding faces as white as my own.

Re-reading this post, I read the words of the most sickening and pathetically servile, bleeding-hearted, lily-livered liberal. Indeed, perhaps it’s not unfair to suggest that this is actually a form of inverse racism: that my feelings of disillusionment at finding fellow Caucasians are just as irrational as if I’d been uncomfortable among people of a different ethnic background.

Yet I can’t help but think there is at least something ‘positive’ in my ‘discrimination’, even if it does present a few thorny questions around our ultimate ambition to eventually settle down and have a family in Market Harborough.

Thursday, 16 July 2009

Confessions of a Championship Manager




In an outrageous tonal gear shift from my last post, I'd like to talk about computers games and football transfers...

I have a strange relationship with computer games. Aged 27, I ought to be the perfect gamer: old enough to remember how monumentally awful graphics and gameplay used to be, yet young enough to hang around the games section of HMV without arousing too much suspicion. Yet I've still never really been a 'gamer'.

Growing up, my brother and I were lucky enough to be given, if always not the newest games console, then at least the 2nd or 3rd newest. Starting with the ZX Spectrum, we were both given Game Boys one (blissful) Christmas, then the Atari ST, NES, SNES, Nintendo 64, a GameGear my Dad somehow procured, Playstation 2 and finally, a couple of years ago a Nintendo Wii.

A list of my favourite games is a fairly predictable list of classics: Paperboy, Tetris, Starwing, Goldeneye, Grand Theft Auto etc, but one game towers above all of these in my affections: Championship Manager (now known as Football Manager after some sort of licensing dispute that I never bothered to find out about). 'Champ Man' as we called it, was and is the defining game of my lifetime. I remember my brother Daniel specifically asking for his Atari ST to be upgraded from a 500k machine (500k!!!!) to a 1Megabyte, just to play the inaugural 'Championship Manager '93'. At first this seemed quite an outlandish request (getting his entire computer taken away and fiddled with, just for one game?!) but it turned out to be a masterstroke.

It says a lot about my relationship with computer games that my fondest memories of lying on the floor in my brothers room, during hours and hours of Champ Man, was not the game itself, but the accompanying music my brother exposed me to. It was during this time (1993-1996) that he'd record songs from the radio, copy tapes from the library and swap them with friends and it seems quite fitting that as we currently witness waves of Britpop nostalgia that I remember my first exposure to some classic albums (Pablo Honey, The Bends, Definitely Maybe, The Holy Bible, Everything Must Go, Dog Man Star, Expecting to Fly etc.) was as they provided soundtracks to our attempts to sign Peter Ndlovu and Julian Joachim.

In essence, it was the atmosphere I enjoyed - the time spent listening to music with my wonderful brother - rather than the game itself.

Indeed, with all computer games, I tend to concentrate on the first couple of levels, but then give up once things get too difficult. Don't get me wrong, this isn't part of some innate snobbery on my part: I'm not one of those people who criticise gaming or see it as 'low art' - on the contrary I think therein lies the future of what we now refer to as 'fiction' and 'narrative'. But something in my DNA just switches off the moment things get tricky. And (confession time) this attitude also applies to Champ Man. If ever left to play the game on my own, I'll simply take control of 4 different clubs, get 3 of these clubs to pay millions of pounds for Nottingham Forest reserve players, quit the 3 dummy teams and steer Forest to glory by flashing this dubiously acquired cash around Europe.

The reason I write this today is that it seems, for the second time, life is imitating art. Around 5 years ago when Chelsea seemed to have an infinite supply of cash, I couldn't wait to buy the papers to read rumours of who their next superstar signing would be. Like my highly corrupt navigation through the Champ Man simulation - Roman Abramovic simply threw lots and lots of money at the biggest names in world football until, eventually, they joined the West Londoners. I'd never been so interested in a football club that I didn't support and I'm pretty sure that my Champ Man habit was to blame for this morbid fascination with greed and inorganic team-building.

Fast forward to this week and I find myself checking the Manchester City website daily, as the financial clout of their owners makes Abramovic look like a poor relation. For some reason I desperately want them to amble into the transfer market like drunk city boys stumbling into an All Bar One. It's gaudy, cheap, nasty and it's exactly how I behaved all those years ago, whilst tapping my foot along to Digsy's Dinner and Animal Nitrate.

So go on, Sparky, do it for me and all the other Champ Man cheats of my generation!

Monday, 13 July 2009

Speeches

It's with some trepidation that I post the following two speeches, and If I don't feel comfortable I could well remove them. The reason for posting is that friends have asked to read both of them over the last few weeks and I don't believe in being precious about my writing, no matter how wonderful or tragic the circumstances. All that remains to say is that I'll endeavour to post the 'Allotment' poem next time I get the chance.

04/04/09

Firstly, I’d like to say how beautiful my wife looks today! May I propose a toast to Mrs Charlotte Watts!

Charlotte and I have been together for seven and a half-years. After a couple of years together, whenever Char started hinting that it was time for me to pop the question, I used to say she had to complete a fifteen year probationary period. (I know, what a swine, eh?) Well, almost exactly halfway into that period, we’re now married, so she must’ve been incredibly well behaved to get such a reduced sentence!

By the way, for any gamblers in the room, I’ve heard Ladbrooke’s are offering good odds on the exact moment I start crying in this speech. If I stick to the script, I might just get through...

Char and I first met on the fruit and veg aisle at Co-Op. I was completely besotted with her, and if you’ve ever seen the uniform girls have to wear at Co-Op, you’ll know that she must have had quite some impact on me, to fall in love with someone in a multi-coloured blouse and blue tabard combination.

Which brings me on to my best man Chris. Because when I told him there was a girl I really liked at work, all those years ago, he stomped into the supermarket one day, stood right next to Char and shouted: “GAZ - IS IT THIS ONE?”

Other than that, Chris is a subtle, sophisticated man and I’m not going to say anything else about him for 2 reasons: 1) He’s about to do a speech about me and 2) I’m saving all that stuff for a speech I’d like to do for him, if he pulls his finger out and does the honourable thing with Cathryn.

Chris has been an amazing friend to me over the years, we’ve been through a lot together and I’d like to think we’ve always been there for each other.

Chris organised the best stag-do I could have possibly hoped for. He arranged for 8 of us to fly to Berlin: one of the most interesting and historic cities in Europe. No other city could claim to have been at the epicentre of so many extraordinary events over the past hundred years, so, of course ... we got drunk every night, watched the snooker on Eurosport and went go-karting!

It was like being in an episode of Auf Wiedersehen Pet.

Seriously, it was an amazing time and just great to let off some steam with my friends was fantastic. Andy had us all in stitches by refusing to speak English - rather he’d spend minutes earnestly consulting his pocket German dictionary before saying ‘Ja, das ist gut!’ Darren was always on-hand with a pithy one-liner that can’t be repeated in polite company, and Steve behaved like he was in an episode of Dad’s Army. I’ll always be grateful to all of you for making it so special.

Similarly, I know Charlotte was delighted with her hen-do, and would like to thank everyone that came along to her animal themed day. The girls visited London zoo, had a boat ride on the Thames and then a night out at a very trendy nightclub in Camden. Charlotte was dressed as a tiger during this night out - if you haven’t seen the photos I urge you to look them up on Facebook.

Personally, I found there were advantages and disadvantages to Char’s hen-night. On the one hand, there was an awful lot of wine left in the flat - greatly appreciated after a hard day’s teaching. But on the other hand, I keep finding what can only be described as ‘phallic’ shiny pink confetti, which was thrown around the flat, has stuck to my clothes. Not a good look for a teacher wanting to be taken seriously in the classroom.

I’d like to thank Charles for a wonderful speech. It’s also great today to finally be able to call him my brother-in-law. Where Charles is concerned, I do feel rather guilty: when I first met him he had chosen sensible, scientific A Levels. Yet, somewhere along the line, someone convinced him that studying English Literature was a good idea. He’s gone on to achieve a first in his English degree and is now doing very well with his Masters. Seriously, if I did have anything to do with this success, it makes me feel very proud indeed. He’s a scholar and a gentleman.

It’s also been brilliant to know Charlotte’s mum, Kate, for all these years. Perhaps it says something about living in a small town, but both Charlotte and I knew our Mother-in-laws before we knew each other: Kate and I worked together at Co-Op, Char worked with Mum at It’s A Gift.

I spoke earlier about falling in love with Charlotte whilst working at the Co-Op and I distinctly remember Kate pulling over in her car one afternoon, winding-down the window and saying ‘go for it, Gaz!’

For that, and for letting my band rehearse in your garage and making a right racket, I’ll always be grateful!

I promise I’ll shut-up in a minute. Apparently, at Ladbrooke’s, they have this moment as odds-on favourite... I’d like to talk a little bit about Mum and Dad. They are the most wonderful parents anyone could hope to have. Thanks to them, Char and I will be jetting off to Egypt for a week of five-star, all-inclusive treatment on Monday. Yet their influence on us goes far beyond a great honeymoon: more than parents or in-laws, they’re our friends. It goes without saying, that if we knew what we know now, we probably wouldn’t have moved to London when we did, and we probably would have got married a lot sooner.

Yet, therein lies what I’d like to express: Mum and Dad have encouraged me in everything I’ve ever done. I’ve never felt that anything was impossible, and without them I could never have dreamed of achieving my Doctorate, or of moving away to London to experience life there.

I’d like to think this goes both ways. Why else would Mum and Dad have seen so many Manic Street Preachers concerts? As I said, they’re friends as well as family, and we’re all going to do all we can to get our family back together and back to normal.

I need to remember that all of this hasn’t been easy on my brother, Daniel, either. He is the sweetest and funniest brother anyone could ever have and I hope he enjoys himself this evening too.

Before I finish, a few thank-yous. Many of us here recently heard the amazing news that Jim and Laura are expecting a baby - we’re all delighted for you, and I do hope McRae Junior will get to spend some time learning from his weird Northern uncle. Jim’s been there for me a lot in recent weeks, so I’d like to thank him. I hope I’ll be able to pay him back by helping out with the baby in the coming months.

Thanks especially to Catherine for helping with the Hen-do and for making this room look so wonderful, and thanks to Charlotte’s Nan for arranging the flowers in the church. Thanks to Jim and to Bobby for reading so beautifully in church. Thanks to my most handsome and erudite friend Simon, who I know has put a lot of thought into his DJ set tonight. As long as he plays some Bee Gees, I’ll be happy. Finally thanks to Andy and my brilliant brother, Dan, for being a comedy double-act masquerading as ushers. When Andy told his girlfriend Sarah that I was writing this speech, she set she thought she’d probably cry. He said: ‘It might not be that bad.’

Thanks to every single one of you here for making our day so special.

I’d like to leave you now with an old Harborian folk poem, called ‘Because’

Because you change the channel at the sound of the Hollyoaks theme,
Because you explain, in detail, your weird and wonderful dreams,
Because you sing along, in the car, to Tenacious D,
Because your ‘thing’ for Patrick Stewart doesn’t bother me...

Because you read Ulysses in the bath,
Because 99% of the time you’re just having a laugh,
Because you’re the greatest teacher I’ve ever met,
But your spelling and grammar make me a little upset,

Because you claim my greatest gift was one I got for free:
A crafty ginger cat that complains constantly,
Because you indulge silly hairstyles, silly songs, silly clothes,
Because what you see in me, Charlotte, God only knows,

Because you make packed-lunches and wedding cake,
Because your favourite film’s ‘Labyrinth’ for goodness sake!
But you’re quite content with a Blue Planet DVD
And your ‘thing’ for David Attenborough doesn’t really bother me (it does)

Because girlfriends are great, but best friends are rare,
Because I can’t imagine coming home without finding you there,
Because I want to be with you for the rest of my life,
And it makes me so proud to call you my wife.


19/06/09

“Isn’t it lovely, when the dawn brings the dew, I’ll be watching over you.”

Many people today will use phrases like “it’s not fair” or “Julie was too young” and of course in one sense they’re right. At only 55, Mum had so much more to give and one of the most heartbreaking aspects of her passing, for me personally, is the fact that if Charlotte and I are lucky enough to have children, they’ll have been deprived of surely the greatest Grandma the world has ever known...

But in another sense I don’t feel it was too early and I’ll try to explain why. Most of us in this room will occasionally have a good day: a day where we do something particularly generous or kind, where we touch someone and make them feel special. As I said, this is occasional. Speaking personally, if I do something nice for someone, it could be a matter of weeks before I feel compelled to do anything else!

But Mum wasn’t like that. She was humble and selfless and loving every single day of her life. Yes, in physical terms 55 is too young, but if you measured time in terms of love shared, Mum gave us a hundred years at least.

So try not to be bitter today. Mum gave us all something special and we should use this day to thank her and have a nice time in her honour - there wasn’t a bitter bone in her body.

“Night night, sleep tight, don’t let the bed bugs bite.”

There are several people I know Mum would like me to thank and if I’ve forgotten anyone please forgive me. Firstly, this church, first lead by Malcolm and now Nick and the dozens of wonderful friends Mum made here. It gives me such comfort to know that Mum found the right community here in which to share her gifts: like Mum, they are selfless, humble and loyal people who found purpose and salvation through faith. I know it was her time spent here learning and, of course, teaching the little ones, that gave her the strength to endure those difficult final weeks.

I’d also like to thank Grandma and Mum’s sisters and brother. I really can’t imagine how any of us would have coped without you. As sisters you all have a very special bond that goes beyond mere words, each sister has different attributes and when they’re brought together can be a quite formidable force that can achieve anything. Mum is proud of you all and I’ll say simply, on behalf of Dad and Daniel: ‘thank you’.

Which brings me to Dad. I’m sure a couple of years ago, none of us here would have had him down, particularly, as a nurse or carer. He certainly doesn’t look like Florence Nightingale. Yet such is his love for Mum, that he grew into the role to become the most gentle, thoughtful and caring nurse anyone could wish to have. Several health workers who visited Mum commented to me that it was the cleanest, most organised home they’d ever visited. Not only did Dad care for Mum, he was also determined to maintain her high standards, such was his pride in her and in their partnership. It wasn’t until the later stages of Mum’s illness that any of us really appreciated how much he was doing - for your superhuman effort, Dad, thank you.

“I stare at the sky and it leaves me blind. I close my eyes and this is yesterday.”

As her sons, I think it’s fair to say that Daniel and I saw a different side to Mum. We introduced her to new music, comedy, books and new ideas and we’d challenge her sometimes and Mum was always up for that challenge. I’m sure I speak for Daniel too when I say that the phrase ‘generation gap’ was always quite alien to us: if I was desperate for my favourite band’s new single to get to number one, Mum would be shouting at the radio with me. If Tottenham scored a late equaliser, Dan could be sure to get a text message from Mum: ‘nice one, Keano!’ The Mum we know is a sharp, intelligent and articulate woman, who always made us feel that we could achieve anything.

The most important element in the relationship between all four of us at home is humour and I know Mum would have appreciated the fact that, even in her final days, we were sharing jokes and laughs around her bed. Mum would have also appreciated the fact that, even when she’d gone, she managed to unwittingly play a joke on me. Let me explain:

When Mum’s illness was first diagnosed I bought her a journal and decorated it with pictures of her favourite comedy characters to cheer her up. The idea was that she should make regular notes about her condition, to keep track of her symptoms and appointments etc. So a few days ago, knowing I had to make this speech, I quickly flicked through this journal, in case Mum had left a message or note she wanted to be shared. Sadly there wasn’t anything particularly relevant to today, but at the bottom of several entries were two words: ‘feel hurt’. As you can imagine, this broke my heart - Mum feels hurt - but something wasn’t quite right about it. That phrase ‘feel hurt’ just didn’t sound like Mum, it was too Americanised, too dramatic. But sure enough, at the bottom of the page on most days ‘feel hurt’. I couldn’t read any more, it was too horrible. This really nagged at me, so I returned to the journal a few days later and eventually all became clear. It seems Mum had a habit of ‘crossing her ‘t’s’ very lightly. In fact, at the end of every day she’d noted feet hurt, feet hurt!

I’m sure she had a good laugh at that one.

“Wish me some luck as you wave goodbye to me. You’re the best friend I ever had.”

I’m going to let Mum have the final say in this speech. I’m really proud of the fact that she was such an eloquent and creative person and this is a poem she had published in 1992 called ‘The Allotment’. In the final lines you’ll notice that Mum makes a wish and I’d like to think that, wherever she is right now, that wish has come true:


The Allotment


My very favourite place to be
on a lovely sunny day,
is where the butterflies float free,
and cabbages decay.

Smell the smouldering bonfire smoke,
with rotting compost heap,
the gentle pace of country folk,
who chat and nod to sleep.

The quiet seclusion of make-shift hut,
Tin roof and propped up doors,
half-full well worn water butt
with sacks of onion stores.

Birds scared off by milk bottle tops
rustling in the breeze
straight, proud rows of healthy crops
carrots, lettuce, peas.

Spade and forks, small flower pots
slow maturing marrow
wallflowers and forget-me-nots
broken wobbly barrow.

I love allotments, always will,
Everything's home grown
All that lovely earth to fill;
One day I'll have my own

Julie Watts

Sunday, 24 May 2009

None Like it Hot!

My father in Law told me this morning that it is supposed to be the hottest day of the year today. This got my brain thinking about global warming, a subject, quite rightly, that i have to teach to every year and age group at school.

As animals at the top of the food chain we can have quite a dramatic effect on the world around us; it is true that if we kill off a major phylum of insect then we are doomed, if we were to be wiped off the face of the planet then everything else would be quite happy and carry on evolving - no harm done.

So we are nothing and everything all at once. We could look upon our existance and evolution as completely natural, that us reaching breaking point and killing off complex life on Earth is just a natural step in earth's history. On the other hand as the only 'intelligent' inhabitants of this planet we should feel morally obligated to control our activities to limit our impact on the other poor wreched organisms which have pulled the short straw of sharing a planet with us.

What I'm getting at is if we decide to control our activities we prolong our demise and fulfil our moral obligation; that life on earth as we know it may continue a little longer. Life has changed immeasurably over the past billion years and will change again in the next billion, our demise will come sooner or later, it's natural and no-one else will care.

Tuesday, 19 May 2009

X-pense claims

Firstly, I'm going to admit that this post is ill-researched and a) could be completely wrong and/or b) could be an argument so old-hat it's being used by the 'Summer Wine' costume department. Nevertheless, it was my gut reaction to a recent news story, and if blogs are useful for one thing, it's disseminating ill thought-out knee-jerk reactions. Perhaps it's just my tendency to be contrary, but my first reaction to the MPs expenses scandal was: 'it's all our fault'.  Allow me to explain:

Let's say, for instance, you regularly vote for Party X. You think it's the party that best serves your interests and you trust it to assemble the best possible team of advisors and representatives, in order that they can win elections and, ultimately, represent you. With me so far?

So, somewhere along the line, it's someone's job to recruit the brightest and best to join the party. By the 'brightest and best', I mean Chief Executives of companies, powerful figures in the world of the media and PR (I believe David Cameron had an executive role at Carlton Television, before joining the Conservatives, for example) and the so-called 'Captains' of industry.

All very well. So Party X spots a Chief Executive they'd love to have on board, and said Chief Exec is quite keen on the chance to enter politics: it appeals to his/her ego and they relish a new challenge. There's only one problem. They're earning 300k a year in their current job, and even if their fledgling political career went extremely well, they still only stand to make around 60k at best.

As far as I can tell, Party X has two options at this point: 1) They reach lower down the food chain of expertise and recruit a sweaty middle-management type in a cheap suit, to whom 60k represents a significant increase in wages, or 2) Point out to the Chief Executive that there's an incredibly generous expenses and privileges package waiting for him/her at Westminster, that no one need ever know about.

So you see my point. If the political parties asked the general public 'should we pay MPs more?' the answer will always be a resounding and obvious 'no'. So, as always seems to be the case in modern politics, they've had to find a third way. If politicians salaries were increased to reflect those of other powerful, influential positions of responsibility, we could scrap the expenses system all together.  'Here's a load of money...' we'd say, 'do what you like with it, so long as you do the best job you possibly can. If you fail, we'll vote you out.' 

Fair enough? Maybe. I'm not entirely convinced of this idea myself, yet. However, I do think it would quickly put an end to the current abuses. It might even attract a better calibre of person to politics, rather than the slimy, robotic Blears-esque twatsalads we've got at the moment.

Of course, I was as outraged by the behaviour of the politicians as anyone else. But I can't help but think that one of the root causes of this type of scandal lies in the general publics churlish, willfully ignorant view of the real world. Take me, for example: my wage is ridiculously low and I have hardly any privileges. Yet the other day when I wanted to send something in the post to my friend Andy,  I didn't think twice about 'abusing' my position and sticking it in the outgoing post tray, even though the letter wasn't college business. The chance to abuse the system was there, so I took it. Perhaps this expenses debacle actually serves to prove that politicians are real people after all.